| Mangra v Mangra |
| Motion No: 2016-01610 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2016 NY Slip Op 91799(U) |
| Decided on November 17, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M221598
E/sl
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ROBERT J. MILLER
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
|
2016-01610, 2016-11454, 2016-11455 Thameshwar Mangra, etc., respondent, v Parbatee Mangra, appellant. (Index No. 17753/13)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay her eviction from the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 29, 2015, and two orders of the same court both dated September 6, 2016, in effect, to amend the caption on the appeal from the judgment to substitute Thameshwar Mangra, as personal representative of the estate of Khamraj Mangra, for the deceased appellant, so that the caption on the appeal from the judgment comports with the captions on the appeals from the orders, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment, and to consolidate the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, to amend the caption on the appeal from the judgment to substitute Thameshwar Mangra, as personal representative of the estate of Khamraj Mangra, for the deceased appellant, on the appeal from the judgment so that the caption on the appeal from the judgment comports with the captions on the appeals from the orders is granted, and the caption is amended accordingly; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is granted, the appellant's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 17, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant's brief must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 670.7[c][1]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court