| Matter of Oliva v New York State Division of Human Rights, also known |
| Motion No: 2016-03966 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2017 NY Slip Op 62501(U) |
| Decided on February 1, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M225153
E/ct
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
|
2016-03966 In the Matter of Vincent Oliva, appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights, also known as DHR, et al., respondents. (Index No. 17504/14)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 28, 2016, as a poor person or to proceed on the original papers, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal, and to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record on appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to proceed on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][iv]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal is granted, and the appellant's time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]), and by serving and filing his brief on the appeal is enlarged until February 28, 2017; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the record or appendix on the appeal is denied as unnecessary.
DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS-RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court