| Daniel Ehrlich v Henry Giminez Joel Kringel |
| Motion No: M-268 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2017 NYSlipOp 64541(U) |
| Decided on February 16, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, First Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
February 16, 2017
Daniel Ehrlich,
Petitioner-Appellant,
For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 75
of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
v
Henry Giminez, Joel Kringel,
Frank Nahoum and Benny Pelkarian,
Respondents-Respondents.
An appeal having been taken from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about March 17, 2016,
and said appeal having been perfected, And, petitioner having moved for an order staying a certain arbitration proceeding pending hearing and determination of the aforesaid appeal, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to
the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is Ordered that the motion is granted.Entered: February 16, 2017
_____________________ DEPUTY CLERK
Present: Hon. Rolando T. Acosta, Justice Presiding, Dianne T. Renwick Karla Moskowitz Paul G. Feinman Ellen Gesmer,Justices
M-268
Index No. 162389/15