| Lexington Acupuncture, P.C., As Assignee of Larry Reznik v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. |
| Motion No: 2010-00803 KC |
| Slip Opinion No: 2017 NY Slip Op 68308(U) |
| Decided on March 15, 2017 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
of the State of New York for the 2nd, 11th & 13th judicial Districts
MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J.
THOMAS P. ALIOTTA
MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
| Lexington Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Larry Reznik, Appellant, v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent. |
Motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered November 18, 2009.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
Contrary to appellant's assertion in opposition to respondent's motion, the provisions of the declaratory judgment entered in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, would appear to apply to the parties to this appeal. Nevertheless, the proper procedure is not a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot but rather for respondent to move for relief in the Civil Court based on the declaratory judgment, as the appeal would not be rendered moot unless and until respondent's res judicata claim is established in the Civil Court. The parties are cautioned that a frivolous appeal may subject the offending parties to sanctions (see Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts [22 NYCRR] part 130; Rules of the Appellate Terms, 2d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 730.3 [g]).
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk