| Kanterakis v Kanterakis |
| Motion No: 2016-10204 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2017 NY Slip Op 68423(U) |
| Decided on March 24, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M228171
E/sl
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
HECTOR D. LASALLE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
|
2016-10204 Nikolaos Kanterakis, respondent-appellant, v Emily Kanterakis, defendant-appellant-respondent; Salvatore A. Lecci, nonparty-appellant- respondent. (Index No. 200615/12)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the defendant-appellant-respondent on appeals and a cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 12, 2016, for leave to reargue her prior motion for leave to prosecute her appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, which was determined by decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 22, 2016. Application by the defendant-appellant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect her appeal. Separate application by the respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect the cross appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the applications are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the nonparty-appellant-respondent's time to perfect his appeal is enlarged; and it is further,
ORDERED that the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until May 23, 2017, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the briefs of the defendant-appellant-respondent and the nonparty-appellant-respondent must be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file an answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).
RIVERA, J.P., HALL, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court