| Tucillo v Town of North Hempstead |
| Motion No: 2016-11590 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2017 NY Slip Op 69352(U) |
| Decided on April 3, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M228688
J/sl
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.
|
2016-11590 Roy Tucillo, appellant, v Town of North Hempstead, et al., respondents. (Index No. 9012/13)
| ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an undated purported judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the parties to the appeal are directed to show cause before this Court why the appeal should or should not be dismissed on the ground that the purported judgment is, in effect, a clerk's extract of the minutes of a jury verdict and no appeal lies from a clerk's extract of the minutes of a jury verdict (see CPLR 5512[a]; Rockman v Brosnan, 280 AD2d 591), by filing an affidavit or affirmation on that issue with the Clerk of this Court on or before May 1, 2017, and by serving one copy of the same on each other; and it is further,
ORDERED that the application is held in abeyance in the interim; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court, or her designee, is directed to serve a copy of this order to show cause on the parties to the appeal by regular mail.
ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court