IN THE MATTER OF EASTBROOKE CONDOMINIUM BY ITS BOARD OF MANAGERS ON BEHALF OF ALL HOMEOWNERS AND BRIGHTON EASTBROOKE

IN THE MATTER OF EASTBROOKE CONDOMINIUM BY ITS BOARD OF MANAGERS ON BEHALF OF ALL HOMEOWNERS AND BRIGHTON EASTBROOKE

Motion No: 142-17

Slip Opinion No: 2017 NY Slip Op 77195(U)

Decided on June 9, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.

June 9, 2017

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

MOTION NO. 142-17
DOCKET NO. CA 16-00031

IN THE MATTER OF EASTBROOKE CONDOMINIUM
BY ITS BOARD OF MANAGERS ON BEHALF OF ALL
HOMEOWNERS AND BRIGHTON EASTBROOKE HOMEOWNERS,
PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V
ELAINE AINSWORTH, ASSESSOR, AND BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
REVIEW OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS,
FOR REVIEW OF A TAX ASSESSMENT UNDER ARTICLE 7
OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW
(PROCEEDING NO. 1.)

IN THE MATTER OF EASTBROOKE CONDOMINIUM
BY ITS BOARD OF MANAGERS ON BEHALF OF ALL
UNIT OWNERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V
ELAINE AINSWORTH, ASSESSOR, AND BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
REVIEW OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
FOR REVIEW OF A TAX ASSESSMENT UNDER ARTICLE 7
OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW
(PROCEEDING NO. 2.)
——————————————————————& mdash;
IN THE MATTER OF EASTBROOKE CONDOMINIUM
BY ITS BOARD OF MANAGERS ON BEHALF OF ALL
UNIT OWNERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V
TOWN OF BRIGHTON BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW,
ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON AND TOWN OF
BRIGHTON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
FOR REVIEW OF A TAX ASSESSMENT UNDER ARTICLE 7
OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW
(PROCEEDING NO. 3.)
(APPEAL NO. 1.)

Appellant having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this Court entered February 10, 2017,

Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Robert L. Jackson, Esq., dated April 19, 2017, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and the affirmation of Thomas A. Fink, Esq., dated April 27, 2017, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.

Entered: June 9, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk