In the Matter of a Custody/Visitation Proceeding Under Article 6 of the Family Court Act. Daniel B.

Motion No: M-3933

Slip Opinion No: 2017 NYSlipOp 84102(U)

Decided on August 29, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department, Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.

August 29, 2017

In the Matter of a Custody/Visitation

Proceeding Under Article 6 of the

Family Court Act.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONFIDENTIAL

Daniel B., Petitioner-Respondent, Docket No. V-34115-15/16C

v

Oksana B.,

Respondent-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Andrew J. Baer, Esq.,

Attorney for the Child.

Elliot Podhorzer, Esq., court attorney for the subject child, having moved on the child's behalf for leave to respond, as a poor person, to the appeal taken from the order of the Family Court, New York County, entered on or about April 21, 2017, for the assignment of counsel, a free copy of the transcript, and for related relief,Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to

the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent

of (1) assigning, pursuant to §1120 of the Family Court Act, Andrew J. Baer, Esq., 299 Broadway, Suite #1415, New York, NY 10007, Telephone No. (212) 233-0318, as counsel for purposes

of responding to the appeal; (2) permitting movant to respond

to the appeal upon a reproduced respondent's brief, on condition that one copy of such brief be served upon the attorney for respondent-appellant and 8 copies thereof are filed with this Court. (See M-3932, decided simultaneously herewith.) ENTERED: August 29, 2017

_____________________ DEPUTY CLERK

Present: Hon. Rolando T. Acosta, Presiding Justice, Peter Tom David Friedman John W. Sweeny, Jr. Dianne T. Renwick, Justices

M-3933