Bekas v Valiotis
Motion No: 2017-04276
Slip Opinion No: 2018 NY Slip Op 60054(U)
Decided on January 2, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M243889

E/afa

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.

SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX

JOSEPH J. MALTESE

HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-04276

Vaia Bekas, appellant, v Stamatiki Valiotis,

respondent.

(Index No. 9939/14)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 27, 2017 , to waive compliance with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 670.10.2(f) regarding certification of the appellant's appendix. Separate motion by the respondent, in effect, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant's appendix is inadequate or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the appellant's motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the respondent's motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is, in effect, to dismiss the appeal is denied on condition that on or before January 29, 2018, the appellant serve and file a supplemental appellant's appendix which contains all of the papers filed in connection with the motion that was determined by the order dated February 27, 2017, and which are not contained in the appellant's appendix previously filed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is granted, the respondent's time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 28, 2018, and the respondent's brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant's motion is denied with leave to renew by a motion made simultaneously with the filing of the supplemental appendix.

DILLON, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court