| Bianco v Law Offices of Yuri Prakhin |
| Motion No: 2017-04561 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2018 NY Slip Op 64616(U) |
| Decided on February 20, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M246188
E/afa
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
|
2017-04561 Tatyana Bianco, appellant-respondent, v Law Offices of Yuri Prakhin, et al., defendants, Steven C. Kletzkin, PLLC, et al., respondents, Schneider Law Group, et al., respondents-appellants. (Index No. 514493/16)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Motion by the appellant-respondent on an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2017, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal and to direct the respondent-appellant to pay a certain sum of costs. Separate motion by the respondents-appellants to enlarge the time to perfect the cross appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the appellant-respondent's motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the respondents-appellants' motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the appellant-respondent's motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal and the respondents-appellants' motion are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant-respondent's time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 22, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent's brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the appellant-respondent's motion which is to direct the respondents-appellants to pay a certain sum of costs is denied in light of the representation by the respondents-appellants that they will pay those costs.
CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court