| Matter of Applications for Extensions of Time |
| Motion No: |
| Slip Opinion No: 2018 NY Slip Op 68134(U) |
| Decided on March 28, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M248160
E/rr
|
In the Matter of Applications for Extensions of Time
| ORDER ON APPLICATION |
Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it is
ORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:
Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended Deadline Bank of New York Mellon v Mangan 2017-11200 +1 Savitri Mangan
Edward Mangan June 4, 2018 Bank of New York v Zarro 2017-09359 +1 Michael Zarro
Anna Zarro May 14, 2018 Brown v Reilly 2018-02119 Linda Brown April 25, 2018 Camacho v Dahiya 2017-10870 Karamvir Dahiya
Dahiya Law Offices, LLC May 29, 2018 Delva v Diocese of Brooklyn 2017-12552 Diocese of Brooklyn
Michael C. Gribbon April 2, 2018 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v McGann 2017-09697 +2 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company May 14, 2018 E. Tetz & Sons, Inc. v Polo Electric Corp. 2017-08552 Polo Electric Corp.
Celebrity Farms, LLC April 25, 20181 East Hampton Union Free School District v Sandpebble Builders, Inc. 2017-01509 East Hampton Union Free School District April 23, 20181 Gorokhova v Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. 2017-08133 +1 Lina Gorokhova April 9, 20181 Gualtieri v Gualtieri 2017-10435 Charisse Gualtieri May 11, 2018 JPMorgan Chase Bank v Nunez 2017-10836 Emilio Nunez June 4, 2018 JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v Doodnauth 2017-10755 +1 Mangotree Real Estate Holdings, LP
Thomas J. Sauers, Inc. April 23, 2018 Kochan v Target Corporation 2017-12275 Target Corporation
Target Enterprise, Inc. June 18, 2018 Kondaur Capital Corporation v Gayot 2017-06843 Kondaur Capital Corporation April 2, 2018 Mallet v City of New York 2017-12699 City of New York
New York City Economic Development Corporation
Apple Industrial Development Corp. April 13, 20181 Matter of Johnson v County of Suffolk 2017-10811 John Johnson
Jeanette Magwood April 25, 2018 McManamon v Rockland County Ancient Order of Hibernians 2017-08011 Town of Orangetown April 27, 2018 Mi Jung Kim v Lewin 2017-08868 Mi Jung Kim May 3, 20181 Nosratabdi v Aroni 2017-10474 Farshad Aroni May 21, 2018 People v DeShields, Ronald 2016-06188 People of State of New York April 24, 2018 People v Gerardi, Peter 2016-01060 Peter Gerardi April 16, 2018 People v Hernandez, Thomas 2017-04410 People of State of New York April 26, 2018 People's United Bank, National Association v MSI Entertainment, LLC 2017-09507 People's United Bank, National Association May 16, 20181 Radosta v Schechter 2017-11358 Deborah Radosta
Michael Radosta May 29, 2018 Rivera v New York City Health and Hospital Corporation 2017-03373 New York City Health and Hospital Corporation
Woodhull Hospital
City of New York April 12, 2018 Santiago v Riccelli Enterprises, Inc. 2017-07675 Debbie Santiago May 24, 20181 Stearns Bank National Association v LoDuca 2017-08842 Paul A. LoDuca April 30, 2018 Stearns Bank National Association v LoDuca 2017-08843 Paul A. LoDuca
April 30, 2018 Strickland v Long Island Railroad 2017-10497 Darci Strickland May 11, 20181 US Bank National Association v Swanson 2017-10131 US Bank National Association May 7, 2018 Wachovia Bank, National Association v Greenberg 2017-07267 Wachovia Bank, National Association April 9, 2018 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Bonanno 2017-10741 +1 Maureen Bonanno April 25, 2018 Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Cody 2017-08514 Willie Cody April 25, 2018 Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Frankel 2017-10753 Sarah Frankel
Benjamin Frankel May 25, 2018
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
1. Extension granted only to the extent indicated.
2. Opposition to this application was received.