| Emigrant Bank v Wade |
| Motion No: 2016-09963 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2018 NY Slip Op 76595(U) |
| Decided on July 2, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M251933
E/afa
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
BETSY BARROS
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
|
2016-09963 Emigrant Bank, etc., respondent, v Richard P. Wade, appellant, et al., defendants. (Index No. 14599/13)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
2018-02708
Emigrant Bank, etc., respondent,
v Richard P. Wade, appellant, et al.,
defendants.
(Index No. 14599/13)
Motion by the appellant to consolidate appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 20, 2016, and a judgment of the same court dated December 5, 2017, to deem the record and briefs filed in connection with the order to be also filed in connection with the appeal from judgment, to deem the appellant's appendix containing the judgment and notice of appeal from the judgment to be a supplemental record filed in connection with the appeals, and, in effect, to confirm that the appeal from the judgment was timely perfected as a condition of the stay granted by a decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 4, 2018, or, in the alternative, to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to consolidate the appeals from the order and the judgment, to deem the record and briefs filed in connection with the order to be also filed in connection with the appeal from the judgment, to deem the appellant's appendix containing the judgment and notice of appeal from the judgment to be a supplemental record filed in connection with the appeals, and, in effect, to confirm that the appeal from the judgment was timely perfected as a condition of the stay are granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to enlarge the time to perfect the appeal from the judgment is denied as academic.
MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court