Matter of Applications for Extensions of Time
Motion No:
Slip Opinion No: 2018 NY Slip Op 90771(U)
Decided on December 13, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M258352

E/

In the Matter of Applications for Extensions

of Time

ORDER ON APPLICATION

Parties in the following causes have filed applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.9(b),(g)(1) to extend the time to perfect or to serve and file a brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the applications, it is

ORDERED that the applications are granted and the following parties in the following causes are granted the specified extensions of time:

Title Docket No. Applicant Name(s) Extended Deadline
Balija v 450 Kent Avenue Condominium 2018-05880 Besnik Balija January 16, 2019
Bank of America, National Association v Mavashev 2018-08676 Roman Mavashev
Michael Mavashev
January 7, 2019
Bank of New York Mellon v Sinclair 2018-07199 Bank of New York Mellon March 1, 2019
Castillo v City of New York 2018-04635 Jose Luis Castillo January 14, 2019
Cremona v Venture Holding & Management Corp. 2018-02953 Venture Holding & Management Corp.

North Eastern Fire & Rescue Apparatus Corp.

January 2, 2019
Deckoff v W. Manning Family Limited Partnership 2018-04770 +1 Stephen H. Deckoff December 17, 2018
Dedaj v Berisha 2018-08069 William V. Decandido, P.C. February 11, 2019
Delgrosso v Carrol 2018-04599 Francine Delgrosso January 9, 2019
Emigrant Funding Corporation v Nunez 2018-12616 Emigrant Funding Corporation January 25, 2019
Encalada v Riverside Retail, LLC 2018-10149 Simon Encalada December 17, 2018
Gooden v EAN Holdings, LLC 2018-08346 Cardette M. Gooden February 11, 2019
HSBC Bank USA, National Association v Scivoletti 2017-05362 +2 HSBC Bank USA, National Association February 19, 2018
Krackmalnik v Maimonides Medical Center 2018-08930 +1 Esther Krackmalnik February 15, 2019
LaSalle Bank, Nassau v Bernard 2018-06643 Simone Bernard January 9, 2019
MCC Realty III, LLC v Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. 2018-06493 MCC Realty III, LLC
MCC Phillips, LLC
CMP Phillips Associates, LLC
MCC Capital, Inc.
MCC Realty Management, Inc.
Michael McCarthy
January 31, 2019
Mansour-Mohamed v State of New York 2017-12444 State of New York January 14, 2019
Matter of Montpay Realty Corp. v Laveman 2018-08224 Robin S. Laveman
Anthony T. Ballato
Gregory W. Carman
Frank L. Gatto
David Chulwoo Lee
Craig Vincent Rizzo
Nassau County Assessment Review Commission
Beaumont Jefferson
County of Nassau
February 11, 2019
Matter of OZ Trucking and Rigging Corp. v New York State Division of 2018-09771 OZ Trucking and Rigging Corp.
Paul Ousey
December 26, 2018
Moccio v Seminara 2018-06097 Vincent A. Moccio January 14, 2019
Myrtle 684, LLC v Tauber 2018-05474 Myrtle 684, LLC December 20, 2018
Navarra v Hannon 2018-09478 Thomas Navarra March 11, 2019
Oppedisano v D'Agostino 2018-06901 Maurizio Oppedisano
Disaro Trucking, Inc.
Airport Holdings
January 2, 2019
Panio v Zitzmann 2018-06529 Colleen Fay December 31, 2018
Procci v 20-30 Merle Realty 2017-12726 Millenium Elevator Group, Inc. January 7, 20191
Rainbow Bridge Health, Inc. v Kosa Properties, LLC 2018-08055 Rainbow Bridge Health, Inc.
Nassau Kong
February 6, 2019
Saporito-Elliott v United Skates of America, Inc. 2018-08568 Lori Saporito-Elliott
James Elliott
January 9, 2019
Sessa v Peconic Bay Medical Center 2018-03076 Judith Sessa January 28, 2019
Shiao v National Bank of New York City 2018-08737 Joann Shiao February 1, 2019
Stuy Group Clifton, LLC v Matriarch Johnson Management, LLC 2018-08306 Matriarch Johnson Management, LLC February 11, 2019
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Guglielmo 2018-08333 +1 Robert Guglielmo
Stacy Guglielmo
February 5, 2019
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Rodriguez 2018-07837 +1 Pedro Antonio Rodriguez January 9, 2019

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

1. Extension granted only to the extent indicated.

2. Opposition to this application was received.