| NOWELLE BIGELOW, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF RYAN DASHAWN ROBINSON V HAMILTON MEDICAL, INC. |
| Motion No: CA 18-01477 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2019 NY Slip Op 62883(U) |
| Decided on January 14, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.
DOCKET NO. CA 18-01477
| NOWELLE BIGELOW, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
OF RYAN DASHAWN ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V HAMILTON MEDICAL, INC., HAMILTON MEDICAL, A.G., HOLLY PAYNE, RT, CURRINA
STONE, RN, ANNA RUSTIN, RN, LINDSEY VALDEZ, RN, EVELYN KHORIATY, M.D., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, MICHAEL L.
KIRSCH, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS AGENT, OFFICER AND/OR EMPLOYEE OF OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., JAMES STOUGHTON,
M.D., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS AGENT, OFFICER AND/OR EMPLOYEE OF OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., AND OUR LADY OF LOURDES
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. |
Appellants Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital, Inc. and Michael L. Kirsch, M.D. having moved for permission to separately perfect their appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Onondaga on July 30, 2018, from appellant James Stoughton, M.D.'s appeal from the same order,
Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of James S. Gleason, Esq., dated December 19, 2018, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and the affirmation of Kathryn M. Beer, Esq., dated December 21, 2018, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied to the extent it seeks permission to perfect the appeals separately, and
It is further ORDERED that all appellants perfect the appeals together on or before February 19, 2019 (see 22 NYCRR § 1250.9 [f] [2]).
Memorandum: No extensions of time to perfect will be granted to defendants-appellants' present counsel absent an unanticipated and extraordinary excuse for the delay.
Entered: January 14, 2019
Mark W. Bennett, Clerk