Haleigh Breest v Paul Haggis .

Motion No: M-2351

Slip Opinion No: 2019 NYSlipOp 70927(U)

Decided on May 16, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department, Motion Decision

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.

May 16, 2019

Haleigh Breest,

Plaintiff-Respondent, CONFIDENTIAL

v

Paul Haggis,

Defendant-Appellant.

An appeal having been taken to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about July 30, 2018, and said appeal having been perfected, And Professor Sally F. Goldfarb, Professor Julie Goldscheid, Professor Victoria Nourse and Legal Momentum having moved for leave to file a brief, Amicus Curiae, in connection with the aforementioned appeal (M-2149), And defendant-appellant having cross-moved to file a supplemental reply brief (M-2351), Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion and cross motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion (M-2149) is granted and the six copies of movant's amicus curiae brief submitted to this Court with the motion papers are deemed filed. Defendant-appellant's cross motion (M-2351) for leave to file a

supplemental reply brief is denied without prejudice to defendant addressing arguments raised in the amicus curiae brief at oral argument. ENTERED: May 16, 2019

_____________________ DEPUTY CLERK

The following order was entered and filed on May 16, 2019:

PRESENT: Hon. John W. Sweeny, Jr.,Justice Presiding, Judith J. Gische Troy K. Webber Jeffrey K. Oing Peter H. Moulton, Justices

M-2351

M-2149

Index No. 161137/17