| Mary Black and David Black v ColgatePalmolive Company |
| Motion No: M-975 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2019 NYSlipOp 71043(U) |
| Decided on May 23, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
May 23, 2019
Mary Black and David Black,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
Colgate-Palmolive Company,
Defendant-Appellant,
Brenntag North America, as successor in
interest to Mineral Pigment Solutions,
Inc., as successor in interest to
Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
Appeals having been taken to this Court by defendant-appellant, Colgate-Palmolive Company, from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about August 6, 2018 and October 12, 2018, And defendant-appellant having moved for consolidation of the aforesaid appeals, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion for consolidation is denied as unnecessary [see 77 NYCRR 1250.9[f][3]), and, sua sponte, the time to perfect the appeal from the August 6, 2019 order is enlarged to the October 2019 Term. ENTERED: May 23, 2019
_____________________ CLERK
Present - Hon. Dianne T. Renwick, Justice Presiding, Rosalyn H. Richter Barbara R. Kapnick Marcy L. Kahn Jeffrey K. Oing, Justices
M-975
Ind. No. 190016/17