| IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW D., EMILY D., JOSEPH D., AND SKYLER D. |
| Motion No: CAF 17-01426 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2019 NY Slip Op 77485(U) |
| Decided on August 12, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.
CAF 17-01426
DOCKET NOS. NA-2077/2080-16
CAF 17-01427
DOCKET NOS. NA-2077/2080-16
CAF 17-01428
DOCKET NOS. NA-2077/2080-16
CAF 17-02101
Docket No: NA-2077/2078/2079/2080-16
| IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW D., EMILY D., JOSEPH D., AND SKYLER
D. STEUBEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; JOSEPH D., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. IN THE
MATTER OF ANDREW D., EMILY D., JOSEPH D., AND SKYLER
D. —————————————————————
——————————— STEUBEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; JOSEPH D., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW D., EMILY D., JOSEPH D., AND SKYLER
D. —————————————————————
——————————— STEUBEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; JOSEPH D., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. IN THE MATTER OF SKYLER D., EMILY D., ANDREW D., AND
JOSEPH D.,
JR. ————————————————————&mdash
;—— STEUBEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; JOSEPH D., SR.,
RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. |
Respondent-appellant having moved to vacate the dismissal of the appeals taken herein from orders of the Family Court, Steuben County, entered June 19, 2017, June 27, 2017, July 24, 2017, and November 16, 2017 (denominated motions for an extension of time to perfect), and to consolidate the appeals,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motions insofar as they seek to vacate the dismissal of the appeals are denied with leave to renew upon the submission of a new motion that includes, among other things, an affidavit setting forth sufficient facts to demonstrate meritorious appeals (see 22 NYCRR 1250.10 [c]), and
It is further ORDERED that the motions insofar as they seek to consolidate the appeals are dismissed as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9 [f] [3]).
Entered: August 12, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court