James Dawson v Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. Adam Leitman Bailey Esq. John Desiderio Esq. and

James Dawson v Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. Adam Leitman Bailey Esq. John Desiderio Esq. and
Motion No: M-6844
Slip Opinion No: 2019 NYSlipOp 80863(U)
Decided on October 3, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.



October 3, 2019

James Dawson,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., Adam Leitman

Bailey, Esq., John Desiderio, Esq., and

Vladimir Mironenko, Esq.,

Defendants-Respondents.

Plaintiff-appellant, pro se, having moved for a further enlargement of time to perfect the appeal taken from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about July 3, 2018, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent of enlarging the time to perfect the appeal to the January 2020 Term, with no further enlargements to be granted. ENTERED: October 3, 2019

_____________________ CLERK

Present - Hon. Angela M. Mazzarelli, Justice Presiding,Barbara R. Kapnick Troy K. Webber Ellen Gesmer Cynthia S. Kern, Justices

M-6844

Index No. 152112/17