ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF
Motion No: CA 19-02063
Slip Opinion No: 2019 NY Slip Op 87158(U)
Decided on December 31, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


December 31, 2019

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

CA 19-02063
CA 19-02296
CA 19-02297
CA 19-02298

ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

(Appeal No. 1.)

ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

(Appeal No. 2.)

ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

(Appeal No. 3.)

ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


Appellant having moved to consolidate the appeals taken herein from orders and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), and December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4), and for an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 1,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted insofar as it seeks to consolidate the appeals, and the appeals from the orders and amended order entered May 3, 2019, and December 9, 2019, are hereby consolidated for the purposes of perfecting and arguing the appeals.

It is further ORDERED that the motion is granted insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 1, the time to perfect appeal No. 1 is extended to March 9, 2020, and, in the event of failure to so perfect, the appeal is hereby dismissed without further order.

It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4 is dismissed as premature (see 22 NYCRR 1250.10 [a]).

Entered: December 31, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court