Matter of D. (Anonymous), Azaria; Administration for Children's Serv
Motion No: 2020-00803
Slip Opinion No: 2020 NY Slip Op 63371(U)
Decided on February 21, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M269772

kbp/

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.

SHERI S. ROMAN

JEFFREY A. COHEN

ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

2020-00803

In the Matter of Azaria D. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services,

petitioner-respondent; Daniele D. (Anonymous),

respondent-appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Adiel D. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services,

petitioner-respondent; Daniele D. (Anonymous),

respondent-appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 2)

In the Matter of Bina D. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services,

petitioner-respondent; Daniele D. (Anonymous),

respondent-appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 3)

In the Matter of Gila D. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services,

petitioner-respondent; Daniele D. (Anonymous),

respondent-appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 4)

In the Matter of Ziva D. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services,

petitioner-respondent; Daniele D. (Anonymous),

respondent-appellant, et al., respondent.

(Proceeding No. 5)

(Docket Nos. N-33834-19, N-33835-19,

N-33836-19, N-33837-19, N-33838-19)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant to stay enforcement of an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 22, 2020, pending hearing and determination of an appeal therefrom, and for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of the order is denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference in the calendaring of the appeal is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act § 1112[a], CPLR 5521).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court