| Spata v Kelly |
| Motion No: 2020-00344 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2020 NY Slip Op 69450(U) |
| Decided on July 31, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M272181
E/sl
SHERI S. ROMAN, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.
|
2020-00344 Stacey Spata, respondent, v James Kelly, appellant. (Index No. 17657/2014)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
2020-00345
Stacey Spata, respondent,
v James Kelly, appellant.
(Index No. 17657/2014)
Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 19, 2019, and December 2, 2019, respectively. Motion by the appellant pro se, inter alia, for poor person relief and the appointment of a legal advisor.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeals on the original papers is granted, and the appeals will be heard on the original papers (including the transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the parties, who are directed to file an original and five duplicate hard copies, and, if represented by counsel, one digital copy, of their respective briefs, and to serve one hard copy on each other (22 NYCRR 1250.5[e], 1250.9[a][4],[c][1],[d],[e]); additionally, the appellant is directed to file proof of service of a subpoena upon the clerk of the court of original instance requiring all documents constituting the record on appeal to be filed in this Court (22 NYCRR 1250.9[a][4][i]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
ROMAN, J.P., MILLER, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court