| Jones v Jones |
| Motion No: 2020-03066 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2020 NY Slip Op 70729(U) |
| Decided on August 28, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M272651
E/jr
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
|
2020-03066 Alfred E. Jones, Jr., appellant, v Maureen E. Jones, respondent. (Index No. 10802/2015)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 15, 2020. Motion by the appellant to stay the sale of the former marital residence, and to stay enforcement of so much of the judgment as requires the parties to select a real estate broker, agree on a sales plan, execute documents to transfer title to the former marital residence, and to stay the respondent from listing the former marital residence for sale, entering into a contract to sell the former marital residence, accept any offers to sell the former marital residence, or take any steps to market or sell the former marital residence, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the sale of the former marital residence, located at 983 Old Medford Avenue, Farmingville, New York, is stayed, enforcement of so much of the judgment dated January 10, 2020, as requires the parties to select a real estate broker, agree on a sales plan, execute documents to transfer title to the former marital residence is stayed, and the respondent is stayed from listing the former marital residence for sale, entering into a contract to sell the former marital residence, accept any offers to sell the former marital residence, or take any steps to market or sell the former marital residence, pending hearing and determination of the appeal, on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before September 29, 2020; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before September 29, 2020, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice.
RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, IANNACCI and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court