| ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF |
| Motion No: CA 19-02063 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2020 NY Slip Op 72147(U) |
| Decided on September 22, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.
CA 19-02063
CA 19-02296
CA 19-02297
CA 19-02298
| ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal
No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No.
4.) |
Appellant having moved to modify orders of this Court entered January 13, 2020, and June 26, 2020, on the appeals taken herein from orders and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), and December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4), having moved for relief pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a), and having moved for other relief,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motions are denied.
Entered: September 22, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court