| Caracciolo v SHS Ralph, LLC |
| Motion No: 2019-08580 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 60334(U) |
| Decided on January 13, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M274979
MB/
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
|
2019-08580 Richard Caracciolo, plaintiff-respondent, v SHS Ralph, LLC, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant, Dina Realty LLC, et al., defendants-respondents; ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation, third-party defendant-appellant-respondent. (Index No. 512132/2016)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 11, 2019. Motion by the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant to extend the time to serve and file an answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][1][iv]).
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted, the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant's time to serve and file an answering brief is extended, and on or before February 16, 2021, the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent-appellant shall serve the answering brief and upload a digital copy of the answering brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website, and file an original and five hard copies of the answering brief in accordance with any applicable administrative order or other order to be issued by the Court; and it is further,
ORDERED that no further extension of time shall be granted.
MASTRO, A.P.J., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court