Kassenoff v Kassenoff
Motion No: 2020-06860
Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 61204(U)
Decided on February 3, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M275408

E/sl

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.

COLLEEN D. DUFFY

HECTOR D. LASALLE

PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2020-06860

Allan Kassenoff, respondent,

v Catherine Kassenoff, appellant.

(Index No. 58217/2019)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

2020-09536, 2020-09537,

2020-09538, 2020-09558

Allan Kassenoff, plaintiff,

v Catherine Kassenoff, defendant.

(Index No. 58217/2019)

Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to appeal to this Court from four orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 29, 2020, November 19, 2020 (two orders), and December 3, 2020, respectively, to stay enforcement of an order of the same court dated August 17, 2020, to reinstate a certain custody order or allow her to have certain unsupervised parental access pending hearing and determination of the appeal from the order dated August 17, 2020, to direct the respondent to pay for supervised visitation between her and the subject children if the supervised visitation continues, to stay all proceedings in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of the appeal from the order dated December 3, 2020, to stay enforcement of the order November 19, 2020, that reappointed a forensic evaluator to provide a supplemental report pending hearing and determination of the appeal or to appoint a new forensic evaluator, to stay the Supreme Court, Westchester County, from enforcing certain court rules that preclude her from making certain motions, and to direct that she be given residential custody of the children for a certain period of time.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal is denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.

DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, LASALLE and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court