| ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF |
| Motion No: CA 19-02063 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 61294(U) |
| Decided on February 1, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.
CA 19-02063
CA 19-02296
CA 19-02297
CA 19-02298
| ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J.
WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE
OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND
DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 4.) |
Appellant having moved for permission to have physical access to the Law Library with respect to the appeals taken herein from orders and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), and December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4),
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.
Entered: February 1, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court