| ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF |
| Motion No: CA 19-02063 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 67209(U) |
| Decided on May 28, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.
CA 19-02063
CA 19-02296
CA 19-02297
CA 19-02298
| ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal
No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK,
INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No.
4.) |
Appellant having moved to vacate the dismissal of the appeal taken herein from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), (denominated a motion to extend the time to perfect), for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from orders of the same court entered December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4), for a stay of proceedings, and for other relief,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motions are denied.
Entered: May 28, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court