| Matter of Parascondola v Romano |
| Motion No: 2021-04550 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 70273(U) |
| Decided on August 13, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M278672
E/sl
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
PAUL WOOTEN
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
|
2021-04550 In the Matter of Danielle Parascondola, respondent, v Michael Romano, appellant. (Docket Nos. V-26286-2010, V-26287-2010)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION |
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 21, 2021. Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to appeal from so much of the order as prohibits him from filing "new petitions, writs or motions" in New York or any other state or territory "without approval of the presiding Judge of the court in which the action is to be filed," and to stay enforcement of that portion of the order, pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to appeal from so much of the order as prohibits the appellant from filing "new petitions, writs or motions" in New York or any other state or territory "without approval of the presiding Judge of the court in which the action is to be filed" is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to stay enforcement of so much of the order as prohibits the appellant from filing "new petitions, writs or motions" in New York or any other state or territory "without approval of the presiding Judge of the court in which the action is to be filed" is granted, and enforcement of that portion of the order is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is perfected on or before October 12, 2021; and it is further,
ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before October 12, 2021, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondent may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further,
ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied.
HINDS-RADIX, J.P., IANNACCI, WOOTEN and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court