Widewaters Properties, Inc. v Scheinberg
Motion No: 2021-04087
Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 74909(U)
Decided on November 22, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports.


Supreme Court of the State of New York

Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

M280096

E/sl

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.

BETSY BARROS

PAUL WOOTEN

JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

2021-04087

Widewaters Properties, Inc., plaintiff-respondent,

v Stanley Scheinberg, defendant, Merwin Smith,

et al., defendants-respondents, Melvin Atlas,

also known as Melvin Bogursky, et al.,

defendants-appellants; Howard Michael Scheinberg

and Caryn Rae Andrews, co-personal representatives

of the Estate of Stanley Scheinberg, nonparty-

appellants.

(Index No. 50390/2017)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 27, 2021. Motion by the defendant-appellant Melvin Atlas, also known as Melvin Bogursky, inter alia, to stay enforcement of stated portions of the order, pending hearing and determination of his appeal. Motion by the nonparty-appellants Howard Michael Scheinberg and Caryn Rae Andrews, co-personal representatives of the Estate of Stanley Scheinberg, and the defendant-appellant Stan Scheinberg LLC, inter alia, to stay enforcement of stated portions of the order, pending hearing and determination of their appeal. By order to show cause dated September 3, 2021, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals on the ground that the notices of appeal were filed in violation of the statutory stay of proceedings and vacating the order dated May 27, 2021 as a nullity, and the motions, inter alia, for a stay were held in abeyance in the interim.

Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the motions, inter alia, for a stay and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal and the motions, inter alia, for a stay are denied.

DILLON, J.P., BARROS, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court