| Chao v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey |
| Motion No: 2021-01288 |
| Slip Opinion No: 2021 NY Slip Op 76014(U) |
| Decided on December 15, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion Decision |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports. |
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
M280466
AFA/
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.
|
2021-01288 George Chao, appellant, v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent, ABM Industries, Inc. et al., respondents; Bombadier Transit Corporation, third-party defendant-respondent. (Index No. 710052/2015)
| DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION , |
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 18, 2020, which was deemed dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a). Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c) to vacate the dismissal of the appeal, to reinstate the appeal, and for poor person relief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to vacate the dismissal of the appeal and to reinstate the appeal are denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for poor person relief is denied as academic.
HINDS-RADIX, J.P., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court