People v Oginski
2014 NY Slip Op 08880 [123 AD3d 1303]
December 18, 2014
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 28, 2015


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Oginski, Appellant.

Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Peters, P.J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), rendered July 25, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child.

Defendant pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced him to the agreed-upon sentence of three years in prison to be followed by seven years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

Contrary to defendant's contention, based upon our review of the plea colloquy, as well as the counseled written waiver of appeal he executed in open court, we conclude that defendant was informed that the right to appeal was separate from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea and that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Munger, 117 AD3d 1343, 1343 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 1040 [2014]; People v Long, 117 AD3d 1326, 1326 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1003 [2014]). In light of his valid appeal waiver, defendant is precluded from challenging his sentence as harsh and excessive (see People v Fligger, 117 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 1061 [2014]; People v Waldron, 115 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 969 [2014]).

Rose, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.