Saleh v Hochberg
2004 NY Slip Op 01710 [5 AD3d 234]
March 16, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 26, 2004


Joseph M. Saleh, Appellant,
v
Ralph R. Hochberg et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered January 10, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendants' motion for sanctions insofar as to direct plaintiff to pay the reasonable costs and attorneys' fees incurred in the defense of the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Since the record discloses that plaintiff, in prolonged litigation, pursued causes of action that were clearly time-barred and otherwise without arguable merit, the motion court's determination that plaintiff should bear the reasonable costs and attorneys' fees incurred in the action's defense constituted a proper exercise of discretion (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a]). The motion court adequately set forth the grounds for exacting costs and attorneys' fees from plaintiff pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 and in so doing was not required to follow the procedural dictates of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2 "in any rigid fashion" (Benefield v New York City Hous. Auth., 260 AD2d 167, 168 [1999]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Sullivan, JJ.