| People v Pedraja |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 02022 [49 AD3d 325] |
| March 11, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| The People of the State of New York,
Respondent, v Edwin Pedraja, Appellant. |
—[*1]
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Sheryl Feldman of counsel), for
respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered on or about January 26, 2006, which, in adjudicating defendant a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, declined to rule on a recommendation in the risk assessment instrument that defendant be assessed 10 points under the risk factor of age at first sex crime, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant concedes that he qualifies as a level two sex offender, based on 80 uncontested points in the risk assessment instrument. The court properly declined to rule on the 10 contested points, since no such ruling was necessary to its determination (cf. People v Graham, 35 AD3d 299 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 808 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.