People v Soto
2009 NY Slip Op 04934 [63 AD3d 512]
June 16, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Mario Soto, Appellant.

[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne Hale of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Mark Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 20, 1991, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There was probable cause for defendant's arrest, because a police officer saw him engage in what the officer reasonably believed to be a drug transaction (see People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 603-604 [1980]). The record establishes that, in a notorious "drug marketplace" (id. at 604), the officer saw the transfer of a shiny object that he recognized, based on his experience, to be drug packaging, and not that he merely saw an unidentified object that he assumed to be drugs because of the character of the location. The record also supports the court's alternative finding that the officer recovered a handgun through a legitimate self-protective measure based on reasonable suspicion and concern for his safety. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.