People ex rel. Tislon v Rock
2011 NY Slip Op 04135 [84 AD3d 1606]
May 19, 2011
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 6, 2011


The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anthony Tislon, Appellant, v David Rock, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[*1] Anthony Tislon, Pine City, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Pritzker, J.), entered February 2, 2010 in Washington County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

In 1998, petitioner was convicted of, among other things, burglary in the second degree and was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to 16 years to life in prison. His conviction was thereafter affirmed on appeal (People v Tislon, 279 AD2d 488 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 807 [2001]). Petitioner brought the instant proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus asserting that his detention is illegal due to the unconstitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted. Supreme Court denied the petition without a hearing, resulting in this appeal.

We affirm. Habeas corpus relief is unavailable where a claim could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion (see People ex rel. Brown v Artus, 64 AD3d 1064, 1064 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 709 [2009]; People ex rel. Howard v Rock, 61 AD3d 1230, 1230 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 702 [2009]). In view of petitioner's failure to take advantage of the appropriate avenues for asserting his constitutional claim and given the absence of circumstances warranting a departure from traditional orderly procedure, we conclude that [*2]Supreme Court properly denied the application (see People ex rel. Brown v Artus, 64 AD3d at 1064; People ex rel. Silverio v Miller, 283 AD2d 702, 703 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.