People v Pierce
2016 NY Slip Op 06337 [142 AD3d 1341]
September 30, 2016
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, November 2, 2016


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald O. Pierce, Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Robert L. Kemp of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Ashley R. Lowry of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered June 19, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). Initially, we note that, "[b]y pleading guilty, defendant forfeited review of [Supreme] Court's Molineux ruling" (People v Brown, 305 AD2d 1068, 1068 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 579 [2003]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the court properly refused to suppress his statements to the police inasmuch as the record establishes that defendant spoke "freely and unguardedly" in the presence of two different police officers after voluntarily waiving his Miranda rights (People v Cascio, 79 AD3d 1809, 1811 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 893 [2011]; see People v Carbonaro, 134 AD3d 1543, 1547-1548 [2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 994 [2016], reconsideration denied 27 NY3d 1149 [2016]; People v Collins, 43 AD3d 1338, 1339 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 1005 [2007]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.