| Matter of Santiago v Venettozzi |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 03231 [149 AD3d 1429] |
| April 27, 2017 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of John Jay Santiago, Petitioner, v Donald Venettozzi, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent. |
John Jay Santiago, Stormville, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
A cell frisk of petitioner's prison cell revealed a hidden weapon in the form of a
5
[*2] We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, we cannot agree that he was improperly denied his right to observe the search of his cell. Our review of the confidential information submitted for in camera review reveals that the order to remove petitioner from his cell during the search was based upon a determination that his presence would have constituted a safety or security risk. Under these circumstances, petitioner was properly denied the right to observe the search of his cell and his removal during the search was not in violation of Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Directive No. 4910 (compare Matter of Kirby v Annucci, 147 AD3d 1134, 1135 [2017]; Matter of Mingo v Chappius, 106 AD3d 1160, 1161 [2013]).
Peters, P.J., Rose, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.