| Infarinato v Rochester Tel. Corp. |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 00654 [158 AD3d 1063] |
| February 2, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Richard Infarinato, Appellant, v Rochester Telephone Corporation et al., Defendants, and Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Rochester Telephone Corporation, Respondent. |
Cheney & Blair, LLP, Geneva (David D. Benz of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
The Glennon Law Firm, P.C., Rochester (Peter J. Glennon of counsel), for defendant-respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered October 20, 2016. The decision, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the first and second causes of action.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Kuhn v Kuhn, 129 AD2d 967, 967 [4th Dept 1987]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [iv]). Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Carni, DeJoseph and Winslow, JJ.