Williams v City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 06374 [188 AD3d 442]
November 5, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 30, 2020


[*1]
 Maurice Williams et al., Respondents,
v
City of New York et al., Appellants.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York� (Eric Lee of counsel), for appellants.

Kahn Gordon Timko & Rodriques, P.C., New York (Nicholas I. Timko of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J), entered on or about March 21, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion by defendants the City of New York, New York City Police Department, and Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (collectively, the City) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the City's contention, it owed plaintiffs a special duty to inform them of decedent's death (see Rugova v City of New York, 132 AD3d 220, 230-231 [1st Dept 2015]). Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the City had documents identifying decedent's next of kin so that its failure to notify family members of his death before disposing of his remains was ministerial, rather than discretionary as the City claims, thus giving rise to a viable action for loss of sepulcher (see Rugova; Tinney v City of New York, 94 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2012]). Accordingly, the City's motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Gische, J.P., Webber, González, Scarpulla, JJ.