Matter of Perkins v Annucci
2023 NY Slip Op 02820 [216 AD3d 1388]
May 25, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 5, 2023


[*1]
 In the Matter of Nayshawn Perkins, Petitioner,
v
Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Nayshawn Perkins, Ogdensburg, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Tucker v Annucci, 204 AD3d 1286, 1287 [3d Dept 2022]; Matter of Jefferies v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 190 AD3d 1250, 1250 [3d Dept 2021]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.