People v Simmonds (2025 NY Slip Op 03448)
People v Simmonds
2025 NY Slip Op 03448 [239 AD3d 1326]
June 6, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 6, 2025


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Meliq Simmonds, Appellant.

Frank Policelli, Utica, for defendant-appellant.

Todd C. Carville, District Attorney, Utica (Dawn Catera Lupi of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Robert Bauer, J.), rendered January 2, 2024. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a firearm.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of a firearm (§ 265.01-b [1]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Lyon, 227 AD3d 1521, 1522 [4th Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 928 [2024]; People v Tennant, 217 AD3d 1564, 1564 [4th Dept 2023]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-566 [2019], cert denied 589 US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Mendoza, 37 NY3d 1075, 1076 [2021]), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Curran, J.P., Bannister, Smith, DelConte and Hannah, JJ.