| People v Castro |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 01216 |
| Decided on March 4, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Julian Joiris, and Allison Marculitis of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Phyllis Chu, J.), rendered June 6, 2022, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the United States Supreme Court's determination in Erlinger v United States (602 US 821) renders unconstitutional the persistent violent felony offender sentencing regime and that his sentence as a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.08) is unconstitutional in light of that determination is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to raise a constitutional challenge before the Supreme Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Hernandez, 43 NY3d 591, 597). We decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., WAN, LOVE and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court