Matter of Donsky v Dermatology Assocs. of Rochester

2003 NY Slip Op 18616 [1 AD3d 1065]

Decided on November 21, 2003

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2003

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.

1255 CA 03-00971

[*1]MATTER OF HOWARD J. DONSKY AND ELIZABETH A. ARTHUR, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ORDER

v

DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF ROCHESTER, P.C., AND ROBERT W. LOSS, JR., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS- RESPONDENTS.

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stander, J.), entered November 6, 2002, which, inter alia, granted in part and denied in part respondents' motion for summary judgment.


HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (FRED G. ATEN, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HARRIS BEACH LLP, PITTSFORD (JOHN T. REFERMAT OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court