People v Beecham
2003 NY Slip Op 20021 [2 AD3d 1492]
Decided on December 29, 2003
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 29, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT HOWARD MILLER WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER

2002-02836

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Roger Beecham, appellant. (Ind. No. 1697/00)





Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for
appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of
counsel; Jonathan E. Rubin on the
memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barros, J.), imposed January 29, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk