| Meadows v Amsted Indus. |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 03401 [6 AD3d 1251] |
| Decided on April 30, 2004 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 30, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND LAWTON, JJ.
619.1 CA 04-00128
[*1]JAMES R. MEADOWS AND DELORES MEADOWS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, ORDER
v
AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., YODER MACHINERY CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. ——————————————————————————- AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, R.N.D. MACHINE CO., INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (David J. Mahoney, J.), granted November 13, 2003. The order granted defendant-third-party plaintiff's motion for an order to compel third-party defendant R.N.D. Machine Co., Inc. to permit inspection of a boring mill.
DAMON & MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (BRUCE D. GROGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LIPSITZ, GREEN, FAHRINGER, ROLL, SALISBURY & CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
KENNEY, SHELTON, LIPTAK & NOWAK, L.L.P., BUFFALO (RANDY C. MALLABER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
WATSON, BENNETT, COLLIGAN, JOHNSON & SCHECHTER, L.L.P., BUFFALO (PAULINE C. WILL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT YODER MACHINERY CO.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: April 30, 2004
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court