| Clark v Krug |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 03429 [6 AD3d 1251] |
| Decided on April 30, 2004 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 30, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND LAWTON, JJ.
649 CA 03-01774
[*1]SANFORD L. CLARK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
THOMAS E. KRUG, TIERNAN, KRUG, CLARK & BUCKLEY, FORMERLY KNOWN AS TIERNAN, KRUG & CLARK, FORMERLY KNOWN AS TIERNAN, KRUG, CLARK & COTTER, TIERNAN & KRUG, TIERNAN, KRUG & SCHNURR, AND JEREMY M. SCHNURR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, J.), entered November 8, 2002. The order, among other things, confirmed the recommendation of a referee to grant in part plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and to deny defendants' cross motion for partial summary judgment.
NAPIER, FITZGERALD & KIRBY, L.L.P., BUFFALO (BRIAN P. FITZGERALD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (MAUREEN T. BASS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF- RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: April 30, 2004
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court