Matter of Pepe v Arcuri
2004 NY Slip Op 04992 [8 AD3d 1048]
June 14, 2004
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004


In the Matter of Vincent Pepe, Appellant, v Michael A. Arcuri, as Oneida County District Attorney, et al., Respondents.

[*1]Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered December 21, 2001 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, dismissed in part the petition seeking certain documents and information under the Freedom of Information Law.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.