| Grant v Bedell |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 05010 [8 AD3d 1131] |
| Decided on June 14, 2004 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 14, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND HAYES, JJ.
831 CA 04-00080
[*1]DALE GRANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
ROBERT A. BEDELL, CITY OF UTICA, BRANJEN REALTY, LLC, COMMUNITY BANK, N.A., AS CUSTODIAN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROBERT D. BEDELL, AND GINA AND MARIA PROPERTIES, LLC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered September 17, 2003. The judgment denied plaintiff's motion challenging the validity of the procedure used by defendants in their tax foreclosure proceeding, and granted defendants' cross motions for summary judgment confirming the validity of the sale, deeds and chain of title.
GUSTAVE J. DE TRAGLIA, JR., UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
TIMOTHY W. MC LERON, ALBANY, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ROBERT A. BEDELL, BRANJEN REALTY, LLC, COMMUNITY BANK, N.A., AS CUSTODIAN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROBERT D. BEDELL, AND GINA AND MARIA PROPERTIES, LLC.
JOHN W. DILLON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, UTICA (CHARLES N. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CITY OF UTICA.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: June 14, 2004
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court