| Hirschfeld v Czaja |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 05335 [8 AD3d 124] |
| June 17, 2004 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Elie Hirschfeld, Appellant, v Richard F. Czaja et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. |
—[*1]Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered February 5, 2003, which denied defendant Abraham Hirschfeld's motion to amend his answer to assert six additional cross claims, unanimously dismissed, with one bill of costs in favor of defendants, payable by plaintiff.
Notwithstanding the dispute over who should manage the partnership, plaintiff is not a party aggrieved by the denial of defendant Hirschfeld's motion to amend his answer. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.