| Spalla v Village of Brockport |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 07020 [11 AD3d 1049] |
| Decided on October 1, 2004 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 1, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., GORSKI, MARTOCHE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
1233 CA 03-01767
[*1]ANTHONY L. SPALLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
VILLAGE OF BROCKPORT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) ———————————————————————————
ANTHONY L. SPALLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
ADAM C. MESITI, MARK CUZZUPOLI, JOSEPH ROZZI, AND ARTHUR G. ZIMMER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 2.) ———————————————————————————
SASHA ESTERIANY, PLAINTIFF,
v
VILLAGE OF BROCKPORT, DEFENDANT. (ACTION NO. 3.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Andrew V. Siracuse, J.), entered July 17, 2003. The order deemed the motion of plaintiff in actions Nos. 1 and 2 for leave to renew a motion to reargue and, upon reargument, denied the motion.
WALSH, ROBERTS & GRACE, BUFFALO (GERALD GRACE, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
GALLO & IACOVANGELO, LLP, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH B. RIZZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HISCOCK, BARCLAY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT P. ROGOFF OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS RICHARD DOUYON AND MICHELLE D. JONES.
KAREN SANDERS, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing consolidated appeals signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 27, 2004,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed [*2]without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: October 1, 2004
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court